Sunday, January 25, 2009
Obama’s Economic Recovery Plan – the environmental component.
Spurring a Clean Energy Economy
• Doubling renewable energy generating capacity over three years. It took 30 years for our nation to reach its current level of renewable generating capacity – the recovery and
reinvestment plan will double that level over the next three years. That increase in capacity is enough to power 6 million American homes.
• Jump-starting the transformation to a bigger, better, smarter grid. The upfront investments and reforms in modernizing our nation’s electricity grid will result in more than 3,000 miles of new or modernized transmission lines and 40 million “Smart Meters” in American homes.
• Weatherizing at least two million homes to save low-income families on average $350 per year and modernizing more than 75% of federal building space, saving taxpayers $2 billion per year in lower federal energy bills. Today, the federal government is the world’s largest consumer of energy. The recovery and reinvestment plan will make an historic investment in upgrading the federal building stock that will save taxpayer dollars and help catalyze a green building industry.
• Launching a Clean Energy Finance Initiative to leverage $100 billion in private sector clean energy investments over three years. The finance authority will provide loan guarantees and other financial support to help ease credit constraints for renewable energy investors and catalyze new private sector investment over the next three years. Sphere: Related Content
Friday, January 23, 2009
Incandescent bulbs on the way out

Associated Press
NEW YORK – Light bulb makers have revamped some plants, shuttered others and invested enormous sums of money in preparation for a technological shift that they believe will revolutionize the industry.
Yet the fact that the incandescent bulb, which has remained largely unchanged for more than a century, is about to become obsolete is lost on the vast majority of the public.
The phase-out of the iconic light bulb begins in three years as part of the energy bill signed in 2007. They will be edged out by light-emitting diodes, or LEDs, made from semiconductors, and compact fluorescent bulbs, known by their twisty, tubular shape.
New regulations require, for instance, that a typical 100-watt bulb be replaced by one that provides the same amount of light with 72 watts. Light bulbs will have to be even more efficient by 2020.
The author of the energy bill's lighting provision, Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., said at the time that incandescents "will be virtually obsolete" by 2014.
Osram Sylvania, one of the world's largest bulb producers, commissioned a survey to find out if the public agreed, only to find out 80 percent of Americans don't know the light bulb, as we know it, is on the way out.
Major bulb manufacturers and retailers are meeting in Dallas this week to find ways to incorporate LEDs into more products, but have been in transition mode for years.
General Electric has closed lighting plants in Brazil, Mexico and the U.S., and Osram Sylvania is modifying existing plants.
The European Union will start phasing incandescent bulbs out this September.
Specialty incandescent bulbs – such as those used in appliances – will be available on a limited basis.
The cost of switching over to LEDs and compact fluorescents could be a jolt to some consumers.
Royal Philips Electronics introduced a line of LEDs in Europe last year for about $90. General Electric's base LED bulb sells for about $35 to $40.
Prices will come down as technology improves, said Charlie Jerabek, president and chief executive of Osram Sylvania.
And the new bulbs do eventually pay off, economically and in efficiency.
A recent study by Rensselaer Polytechic Institute estimates global financial savings from LEDs could exceed $10 trillion within 10 years because they last much longer.
Americans keep about 73 million lights on every day for a period of between four and 12 hours, with about 28 million powered by energy-efficient bulbs, according to the Department of Energy.
The new lighting standards coming online are expected to lower consumers' annual electricity bills by $13 billion in 2020.
Incandescent bulbs, invented by Thomas Edison more than 120 years ago, brighten a room by heating a metal filament in a vacuum, but waste large amounts of heat.
Compact fluorescent bulbs contain a gas that reacts with electricity to create invisible ultraviolet light. When that light hits material inside the bulb, it is converted into ordinary light.
But some people find the light from compact bulbs harsh, and the fluorescents contain toxic mercury, meaning they shouldn't simply be thrown in the trash.
LEDs emit very little heat, do not contain mercury like compact fluorescent bulbs, are about 40 percent more efficient, and if installed correctly last for more than 50,000 hours.
So far only 12 percent of Osram Sylvania's business comes from LEDs. The company plans to market LED bulbs for home use within three months.
For lighting engineers, the LED has become the new playground. They can be designed to change colors and have multiple applications, from mood lighting in the living room to the harsh environent of a rock concert stage.
"The way we interact with lighting systems is going to change dramatically," said the American Lighting Association's Terry McGowan. "It's limited only by your imagination, or your budget."
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Making our own power.

Today I had a site visit from a representative of Standard Solar, one of the new and local green energy businesses in the DC Metro area.
We live in a home that was built in 1929. Energy efficiency is not something that was really a part of home building then – the insulation is woefully insufficient, the window frames are drafty, and the fact that it is a multi-level structure means that comfortably (and evenly) heating and cooling the house is a significant challenge.
We bought the house in 2005, enamored of the bright airy feel and cosmetic updates completed by the previous owners. Needless to say, cosmetics don’t help the utility bill; in fact, many of the changes made to the home such as additional lighting, central heat and air, and outdoor landscape lighting simply increase the energy use and the carbon footprint of our little patch of paradise.
Right away, we started making some changes. More energy efficient appliances were the first things we added. We didn’t purchase all Energy Star appliances, due to our budget at the time, but we were mindful of the energy ratings on everything we purchased. While we wouldn’t have installed the central air/heat unit in the manner the previous owners chose, we also realize that in a few short years we’ll need to replace the whole thing. Insulation, caulking, and CFL bulbs have all been added, and yet our utility bills are still significant. What we do have working for us is plenty of bright, sunshiny roof space.
Here is what we learned in today’s visit with the fine folks at Standard Solar:
1. Our available space to place panels is large enough for panels that can offset more than 50% of our electricity usage.
2. Our energy usage, for our square footage, is below average.
3. The cost of the panels and installation, after state grants and tax credits are realized, will be paid back through electric cost savings in less than 5 years.
4. Standard Solar has extremely knowledgeable staff, ready to help us wade through the maze of grants and tax credits.
5. Once in place, the use of solar energy means we will be using far less energy from coal. This makes me very happy.
This is just the beginning of our planning. I’ll be posting updates as they occur. Sphere: Related Content
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Scientists Agree on Global Warming
(CNN) -- Human-induced global warming is real, according to a recent U.S. survey based on the opinions of 3,146 scientists. However there remains divisions between climatologists and scientists from other areas of earth sciences as to the extent of human responsibility.
Against a backdrop of harsh winter weather across much of North America and Europe, the concept of rising global temperatures might seem incongruous.
However the results of the investigation conducted at the end of 2008 reveal that vast majority of the Earth scientists surveyed agree that in the past 200-plus years, mean global temperatures have been rising and that human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures.
The study released today was conducted by academics from the University of Illinois, who used an online questionnaire of nine questions. The scientists approached were listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments.
Two questions were key: Have mean global temperatures risen compared to pre-1800s levels, and has human activity been a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures?
About 90 percent of the scientists agreed with the first question and 82 percent the second.
The strongest consensus on the causes of global warming came from climatologists who are active in climate research, with 97 percent agreeing humans play a role.
Petroleum geologists and meteorologists were among the biggest doubters, with only 47 percent and 64 percent, respectively, believing in human involvement.
"The petroleum geologist response is not too surprising, but the meteorologists' is very interesting," said Peter Doran associate professor of earth and environmental sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and one of the survey's authors.
"Most members of the public think meteorologists know climate, but most of them actually study very short-term phenomenon."
However, Doran was not surprised by the near-unanimous agreement by climatologists.
"They're the ones who study and publish on climate science. So I guess the take-home message is, the more you know about the field of climate science, the more you're likely to believe in global warming and humankind's contribution to it.
"The debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes," said Doran.
Full article at http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/01/19/eco.globalwarmingsurvey/index.html
Monday, January 19, 2009
Green Guest Suggestion

One of the recent changes we’ve made in the Green Guest household is to use cloth napkins instead of paper napkins. Once saved for only formal occasions, we realized we could save money by using cloth napkins for every meal. Not only do we save the cost of purchasing paper napkins that get thrown away after each use, but we also save landfill/recycle space, and contribute to the reduction of the number of trees cut down for paper.
The up-front cost of buying cloth napkins doesn’t have to be a challenge to your budget, either. Check re-sale shops, garage sales, and discount retailers for bargain prices. Because they are relatively small, washing them doesn’t take any significant additional resources – we just toss them in with our regular loads of laundry.
While you’re at it, consider cloth dishtowels and sponges to reduce the use of paper towels – one more way to save money, trees, and our Blue Planet. Sphere: Related Content
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Recycle this!
The daily newspapers that you and I place in our curbside recycling bin travels to a recycling distributor here in the states. The papers are then bundled in huge bales to be re-processed. Historically, there has been significant money to be made for distributors by sending bales of newspapers to China, which has very limited access to raw materials for making their own paper. China then recycles our old newspapers into cardboard products, which packages the electronics that we buy from China and then import back in to the states. Trouble is, as our economy tightens, we aren’t buying as many HDTVs or PlayStations, so China doesn’t need as many cardboard boxes, and consequently they don’t need our curbside recycled newspaper. Our stateside recycling distributors face much lower prices for bales of newspaper, and the report cited instances when it was much cheaper to just dump the papers in a landfill.
How can this be? You mean to tell me there is NOTHING else that can be done with recycled newspaper? By way of answering my own question, I say this:
Yup. Toilet paper. I’ve only seen one or two significant manufacturers of 100% recycled toilet paper, and I’ve certainly never seen any recycled toilet paper at any of the local Big Box stores. Doesn’t mean it’s not there, I just haven’t seen it. I have seen yards of shelving dedicated to all the big national brands of pristine white paper in varying degrees of softness, all of which can be enjoyed for a brief second or two before it disappears for good in the municipal waste water system. I don’t understand this. How could switching to recycled household paper products benefit our Blue Planet? The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) cites these statistics:
• If every household in the U.S. replaced just one box of virgin fiber facial tissues (175) sheets with 100% recycled ones, we could save 163,000 trees.
• If every household in the U.S. replaced just one roll of virgin fiber paper towels (70 sheets) with 100% recycled ones, we could save 544,000 trees.
• If every household in the U.S. replaced just one package of virgin paper napkins (250 count) with 100% recycled ones, we could save 1 million trees.
It is true that 100% recycled products currently cost a bit more than the virgin fiber products. However, as increased consumer demand creates incentives for increased production, competition between manufacturers will drive the market price lower. Already, some big paper companies are trying to appeal to environmental concerns by creating a line of paper products that incorporate a blend of recycled fibers. In the mean time, you can save money on buying 100% recycled paper products with bulk purchasing through office supply stores, and utilizing coupons and sales.
It is also true that in a side-by-side testing, virgin fiber paper is softer than 100% recycled paper. To this I say, we can put a man on the moon. Don’t tell me we can’t figure out how to make 100% recycled toilet paper as soft as the feel of some of the big name brands - pillows or quilts or embedded lotion or whatever the current advertising trend might involve. As for the Green Guest household, we have historically purchased store brand instead of the fancy fluffy stuff. We notice no difference in our switch to 100% recycled, and in comparison with certain store or discount brands, the 100% recycled paper is the more comfortable choice.
As Americans, we are improving in our recycling efforts. As the practice of recycling becomes more and more mainstream, we’ll have to figure out exactly what to do with all that “raw” material. Since recycling is only one part of the “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle” model, it is imperative that we make the best use of the “Recycle” part of the equation by embracing “Reuse” with equal enthusiasm. I can’t think of a better “Reuse” for my old newspapers and junk mail than turning it into toilet paper. Can you?
Sources:
National Resources Defense Council - http://www.nrdc.org/land/forests/gtissue.asp Sphere: Related Content
Sunday, January 11, 2009
A new documentary
I haven't seen this one in its entirety yet, only the various trailers on YouTube. It is on my wish list now.
Check out the preview:
Sphere: Related Content
Saturday, January 10, 2009
King Day of Service - January 19, 2009

President-elect Barack Obama has called for a renewed commitment to a national day of service in honor of MLK Day on January 19th. MLK Day is a federal holiday, marking the birthday of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and this year it is the day before the inauguration of the new President.
Established by Congress in 1994, the King Day of Service honors Dr. King’s belief in the power of service to strengthen communities, as well as his commitment to non-violence and social justice. As our Blue Planet faces issues such as environmental degradation, wars, poverty, and disease, it is only appropriate that we act with the quintessence of a good Green Guest, and help our host by lending a hand.
Wherever your interests lie, there are volunteer opportunities. Food kitchens, schools, religious organizations, community gardens, blood banks, trail pick-ups, pet shelters, libraries, and homeless shelters – the list goes on and on, and they all need our help. I’ll be donating some time to help clean up part of my bike commuter route on Northeast/Northwest Branch Trail. Yes, I’ll post pictures.
Want to volunteer some time, but don’t know where to start? Here are some organizations that will help to match you up with volunteer opportunities in your area that meet your interests:
www.smartvolunteer.org
www.volunteermatch.org
www.onebrick.org
www.usaservice.org
Please let me know what YOU are doing on January 19th – share your story and pictures here with me and the rest of the Green Guest community, or on our Facebook group of the same name. Show us how you are a Green Guest of a Blue Planet. Sphere: Related Content
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Exxon isn't using their listening skills.
Ever since the Valdez took a drunk driving wrong turn in to Prince William’s Sound in 1989, followed by Exxon fighting tooth and nail to not pay damages for the environmental disaster that ensued, I have been unable to even contemplate buying Exxon products. If I were on my last fumes of gas, and ran out in front of an Exxon pump, I would still walk down the road to get a can full of anything BUT Exxon gasoline. Yes, I can hold a grudge.
Which is why lately I find myself muttering things like, “Why doesn’t Exxon ‘get’ it?”, so often during this last year of skyrocketing oil prices. They report record profits, yet again try to wiggle out of paying what they owe to the state of Alaska. While oil companies like Shell and BP are running ads talking about their renewed commitment and increased investments in alternative fuels, Exxon runs ads talking about how smart their engineers are to be able to figure out how to drill deeper and in new places in the Arctic. Bah.
I realize that Shell and BP aren’t saints when it comes to environmental issues. I’m no fool. But they are at least responding to consumer demand by making an effort in the right direction. Exxon just keeps on with the same game plan. I just heard a report – sorry I can’t cite it, but I’ll do some more research – saying that Exxon was worth more money than all of the auto manufacturers combined IN THE WORLD. And another report from USNews.com showed earnings in 2007 of 40.6 billion dollars. That’s Billion, with a B. I think I know where the auto maker’s bailout should come from…
I’m not against a company turning a profit. That is what makes our economy work. But what I am against is making a profit at the expense of corporate responsibilities. Just like my description of what a Green Guest should be, if you make a mess, clean it up. And how unethical is it to make record shattering profits during a time when consumers are hit with the highest pump prices ever? C’mon, Exxon. You’ve got the money, the power, the influence. With that kind of money, you could revolutionize energy production, and be a leader in solar, wind, wave, and battery technology. C'mon. Why not do the right thing? Sphere: Related Content
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Energy Vampires
Everything that plugs in is sucking electric energy, but we learned that even devices that are turned “off” are still consuming energy. If it has a clock, a charging indicator, or any sort of electronic “brain”, it is sucking energy and dollars simply by being plugged in to the wall. Here’s a breakdown of what it looks like:

Obviously, the best way to avoid this is to have no electronic devices in your household. No one wants to do that, understandably, so the next best method is to unplug all our wonderful electronics when they aren’t being used. For convenience, plug all those items in to power strips so that several related pieces of equipment can be turned off or unplugged at once (TV, DVD player, and cable box, for example). Once your cell phone is fully charged, unplug the charger from the wall. The same goes for electric razors, iPods, and any other chargeable electronic device. Just removing your phone from the charger doesn’t solve the problem – the charger is still pulling juice. I go as far as unplugging my laptop when the battery is fully charged, even if I’m using it. I can plug back in when the battery gets low, but there’s no reason to suck more energy than I’m using.
So pick your reason for unplugging. Want to save some money on your utility bill? Want to save a mountaintop? Both? Unplug when you aren’t using or re-charging. Keep away the energy vampires. Sphere: Related Content
Saturday, January 3, 2009
My dream home
The director of Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN), Mike Tidwell, has taken his 1920’s (or maybe 1930’s?) bungalow in Takoma Park, Maryland, and turned it in to a showcase of renewable energy living. More importantly, he shows that achieving a 90% renewable energy household is absolutely attainable for the average American homeowner.
Here in his own words, is the story of Mike Tidwell's home. Sphere: Related Content
Thursday, January 1, 2009
It’s a Brand New Year.
And what a wonderful year it promises to be…
Yes, the economy is hurting, yes, there are wars happening for reasons that may or may not be for the right reasons. Global warming, joblessness, violence, corruption, and greed have dominated the news. Yet here we are, on the brink of history: a new President that promises to be every bit the change he said he would be, and the growing environmental movement that promises to be the tipping point towards global stewardship instead of our long history of use and abuse of resources. I am so excited about the possibilities that I can hardly stand it.
Here in the Green Guest household, we avoid New Year’s “resolutions”. We tend towards a New Year’s “theme”. We each choose one, and they usually compliment each other nicely. Previous years’ themes have been concepts such as “abundance”, or “kindness”, or “sharing”. This year, Mrs. Green Guest chose “Reduction” as her theme – she is interested in reducing spending, reducing waste, and reducing overconsumption in a variety of areas. Once again, it pairs nicely with my theme of “Sufficiency”. My concept of sufficiency means having or using only what is sufficient for our needs, with no waste or excess. Do we really need three lamps on in the living room, or is one “sufficient” for our needs? Do we really need toilet paper made fresh from the trees of the forest, or is 100% recycled toilet paper “sufficient” for our needs? Think about THAT one for a minute, will ya? How much of what we buy, consume, and use do we really need, and how much is really sufficient for our needs?
To that end, I give you “The Story of Stuff”. Props to my buddy Hank for reminding me about one of my favorite web videos. If you haven’t already seen it, spend an easy 20 minutes watching it, please. It is a fantastic way to start the New Year. If you have already seen it, ditto what I just said. It bears repeating.
http://www.storyofstuff.com/
So what about you? What are your resolutions or themes for the New Year? I’d love to hear about them. There is power in numbers, so share with us! We’ll cheer you on! From the Green Guest household to yours, best wishes for a Happy New Year! Sphere: Related Content
